Morris v. Nummy et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 12

ORDERED that 9 objection to 3 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; and (3) The Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(b)(1) as the complaint is not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 2/26/2010. (cb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION G E O R G E HOEY MORRIS, # 1 1 6 7 2 -0 0 2 P l a i n t if f , v. AL A N NUMMEY, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C A SE NO. 2:09-CV-1086-ID (W O ) ORDER A fte r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . The plaintiff's objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on F e b ru a ry 16, 2010 (Doc. No. 9), is overruled; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on December 7, 2009 (Doc. N o . 3), is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3 . The Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process p u rsu a n t to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(A)(b)(1) as the complaint is not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations. DONE this 26 th day of February, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?