Morris v. Nummy et al (INMATE 2)
(VACATED PER 7 ORDER)ORDERED that: (1) The 3 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and (2) This case be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(b)(1) as the complaint is not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 12/28/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, ) Modified on 1/29/2010 to vacate order. (cb, ).
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION G E O R G E HOEY MORRIS, #11672-002, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:09-CV-1086-ID [W O ]
A LA N NUMMEY, et al., Defendants.
O n December 7, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 3) in this c a se to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is O R D E R E D that: 1. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 3) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and T h is case be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U . S. C . § 1915(A)(b)(1) as the complaint is not filed within the time prescribed b y the applicable period of limitations. An appropriate judgment will be entered. D o n e this 28 th day of December, 2009.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?