Hines v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; that the Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment 9 and 20 are GRANTED; that judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants; and that the costs of this proceeding are TAXED against Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 5/6/2010. (jg, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RONALD HINES, #156 086, P la in ti ff , v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) O RDER The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #22) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. that the RECOMMENDATION (Doc. #22) of the Magistrate Judge is A DO PT ED ; 2. that the Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. #9, 20) are GRANTED; 3. 4. that judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants; and that the costs of this proceeding are TAXED against Plaintiff.
CASE NO. 2:09-cv-1113-TMH
LOUIS BOYD, et al., Defendants.
A separate judgment shall issue. Done this 6th day of May, 2010. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?