Morris v. Coram (INMATE3)

Filing 12

ORDER that plaintiff's 11 Objection is OVERRULED; that 10 Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/31/2011. (cc, )

Download PDF
Morris v. Coram (INMATE3) Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF NORTHERN DIVISION GEORGE HOEY MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS CORAM, JR., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:09cv1126-ID (WO) ORDER Currently before the Court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #10), and the Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #11). The Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff has objected. After this review, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED that: 1. The Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #11), be and the same is hereby OVERRULED; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #10), be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; and 3. This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court will enter a separate final judgment. 1 Dockets.Justia.com DONE this the 31st day of March, 2011. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?