Zeigler v. Keller (INMATE 3)
ORDER AND OPINION directing that it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 13 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED without prejudice because of Zeiglers failure to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the procedures established by the BOP and because this case is not ripe for review. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 7/12/10. (scn, )
Z e i g l e r v. Keller (INMATE 3)
D o c . 14
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION D AR R Y L ZEIGLER, P e t i t io n e r , v. J . A. KELLER, R e sp o n d e n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:10cv91-ID
O R D E R AND OPINION O n June 16, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which n o timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 13). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be a n d is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief is D ISM ISSE D without prejudice because of Zeigler's failure to exhaust administrative r e m e d i e s in accordance with the procedures established by the BOP and because this case is not ripe for review. Done this the 12 th day of July, 2010.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?