Gray v. Fox et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 43

ORDER; that 1. The plaintiff's objection 42 to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on September 2, 2010 is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 41 filed on August 25, 2010 is adopted; 3. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 39 is GRANTED as further set out; 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice as further set out. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/30/2010. (jg, )

Download PDF
Gray v. Fox et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 43 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF NORTHERN DIVISION PAUL LINDSEY GRAY, JR., Plaintiff, v. WARDEN FOX, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:10-cv-0172-TMH WO ORDER After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #42) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on September 2, 2010 is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #41) filed on August 25, 2010 is adopted; 3. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. #39) is GRANTED to the extent defendants seek dismissal of this case due to plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Elmore County Jail. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a) for plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him during his confinement in the Elmore County Jail. DONE this the 30th day of September, 2010. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?