Barlow v. Keller (INMATE 3)
ORDER AND OPINION, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 13 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 USC § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED without prejudice because this case is not ripe for review and because of Barlow's failure to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the procedures established by the BOP. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/17/2010. (wcl, )
B a r l o w v. Keller (INMATE 3)
D o c . 14
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION T E R R E N C E BARLOW, P e titio n e r, v. J . A. KELLER, R e s p o n d e n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:10cv174-TMH
O R D E R AND OPINION O n June 18, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which n o timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 13). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be a n d is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief is D IS M IS S E D without prejudice because this case is not ripe for review and because of B a rlo w 's failure to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the procedures e s ta b lis h e d by the BOP. D o n e this the 17 th day of September, 2010.
/s / Truman M. Hobbs ___________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?