Davis v. Keller (INMATE3)
OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 12 Recommendation; denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus; dismissing the petition without prejudice because this case is not ripe for review and for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the procedures established by the Bureau of Prisons. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/16/2010. (br, )
D a v i s v. Keller (INMATE3)
D o c . 13
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION R A Y LONNIE DAVIS, P e t i t io n e r , v. J.A. KELLER, R e sp o n d e n t. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv180-TMH (WO)
O P I N I O N and ORDER O n July 8, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which n o timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for g o o d cause, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED, the petition for w r i t of habeas corpus be and is hereby DENIED, and the petition be and is hereby D IS M IS S E D without prejudice because this case is not ripe for review and for the plaintiff's f a ilu re to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the procedures established by th e Bureau of Prisons. D o n e this 16 th day of September, 2010.
/s / Truman M. Hobbs __________________________________________ T R U M A N M. HOBBS S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?