Weatherly et al v. Alabama State University

Filing 131

ORDER: Upon consideration of the Plaintiffs' 105 Proposed Jury Charges, filed on 1/23/2012, it appears to the court that the Plaintiffs are not asserting any disparate treatment claims at trial, but only hostile environment and retaliation cla ims. If that conclusion is in error, the Plaintiffs are given until noon on 2/1/2012 to so notify the court, and to supplement their requested jury charges with proposed charges on any disparate treatment claims they are asserting. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/30/2012. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

JACQUELINE WEATHERLY,
CYNTHIA WILLIAMS, and LYDIA
BURKHALTER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 2:10cv192-WHA
(wo)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Plaintiffs’ Proposed Jury Charges (Doc.#105), filed on January
23, 2012, it appears to the court that the Plaintiffs are not asserting any disparate treatment claims
at trial, but only hostile environment and retaliation claims. If that conclusion is in error, the
Plaintiffs are given until noon on February 1, 2012 to so notify the court, and to supplement
their requested jury charges with proposed charges on any disparate treatment claims they are
asserting.

Done this 30th day of January, 2012.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE