Pugh et al v. General Electric Company et al
ORDER directing that after reviewing the 36 Motion, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED that on or before August 16, 2010, the parties show cause as to why the Plaintiff's 36 Motion to Dismiss should not be granted, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 8/12/10. (scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION
J U L IU S PUGH and ANNIE PU G H, P la in tiffs , v. G E N E R A L ELECTRIC COMPANY, d /b /a / G.E. Money Bank, a fo re ig n c o m p a n y , and TRANS UNION, L L C , a foreign Limited Liability Company, D e fe n d a n ts .
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C iv il Action No. 2:10-cv-221-ID (W O )
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendant GE Money Bank (improperly identified in the Complaint as General Electric Company d/b/a G.E. Money Bank) (Doc. #36). After reviewing the Motion, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED that on or before August 16, 2010, the parties show cause why the Plaintiffs' Motion (Doc. #36) should not be granted. If there is no response on or before August 16, 2010, the Court will assume there is no objection to the Plaintiffs' Motion. Done this the 12th day of August, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?