Pickett v. Astrue

Filing 15

ORDER; that the magistrate judge entered a recommendation 14 in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the recommendation and after an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the recommendation 14 of the magistrate judge is adopted. A separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 12/6/2010. (jg, )

Download PDF
-WC Pickett v. Astrue (MAG+) Doc. 15 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES WESLEY PICKETT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv273-MHT ) ( WO) ) ) ) ) ORDER The magistrate judge entered a recommendation (Doc. #14) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the recommendation and after an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the recommendation (Doc. #14) of the magistrate judge is adopted. A separate judgment shall issue. DONE, this the 6th day of December, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?