Frazier v. Colonial Bank et al (MAG+)

Filing 45

OPINION. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/7/2011. (wcl, )

-WC Frazier v. Colonial Bank et al (MAG+)

Doc. 45

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DAWN FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. COLONIAL BANK, et al., Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv287-MHT (WO)

Plaintiff Dawn Frazier filed this lawsuit against defendants Colonial Bank, Branch Banking and Trust

Company (also known as BB&T), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (also known as FDIC), as receiver for Colonial of Bank. Colonial Frazier Bank, claims she that, while an to

employee

was

subjected

retaliation, a hostile-work environment, race and gender discrimination, and maternity-leave discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e to 2000e-17), and the Family and Medical Leave Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-

Dockets.Justia.com

2654).

This matter is now before the court on the

recommendation of the magistrate judge that the FDIC's motion to substitute party should be granted; BB&T's motions to dismiss denied as moot; the FDIC's motion to dismiss granted; and this case dismissed in its entirety for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. filed objections to the recommendation. Frazier has After an

independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that Frazier's objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 7th day of March, 2011.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE