Carthen v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER directing that: (1) the 52 Report and Recommendation of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (2) defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; (3) this action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and (4) the costs of this proceeding are TAXED against plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/31/13. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
TREMANE D. CARTHEN, #221052,
D. T. MARSHALL, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-334-WKW
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. # 52) in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation,
and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the
Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 52) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are GRANTED;
3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
4. The costs of this proceeding are TAXED against Plaintiff.
A separate judgment will be entered.
DONE this 31st day of May, 2013.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?