Dumonde v. Lappin et al
ORDER adopting the 4 RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge; dismissing constitutional claims against Harley Lappin in his official capacity and the Federal Bureau of Prisons for lack of jurisdiction; dismissing plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. § 1985 claims against all Defendants as barred by the statute of limitations; dismissing any claims against Harley Lappin in his individual capacity as barred by the statute of limitations. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 5/28/2010. (br, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION D A N IE L LAFITTE DUMONDE, P la in tif f , v. H A R L E Y LAPPIN, et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-339-WKW
ORDER N o objections having been filed to the Order and Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e (Doc. # 4) ("Recommendation"), and after an independent review, it is ORDERED as f o llo w s : (1 ) The Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2 ) Mr. Dumonde's constitutional claims against Harley Lappin in his official c a p a c ity and the Federal Bureau of Prisons are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; (3 ) Mr. Dumonde's 42 U.S.C. § 1985 claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED a s barred by the statute of limitations; and, (4 ) To the extent Mr. Dumonde brings any claims against Harley Lappin in his in d iv id u a l capacity, they are DISMISSED as barred by the statute of limitations. F in a l judgment will be entered separately. D O N E this 28th day of May, 2010. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?