Wallace v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 18

ORDER directing that it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 17 Objection to the Recommendation be and the same is hereby OVERRULED; (2) The 14 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROV ED and AFFIRMED; (3) Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be and the same is hereby DENIED; and (4) This case be and the same is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 6/18/10. (scn, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION J A M E S EDWARD WALLACE, #207922 P la in tif f , v. R IC H A R D ALLEN, et al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:10-cv-361-ID ) ) ) ) ) ORDER B e f o re the Court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #14, filed M a y 24, 2010) and Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommendation (Doc. #17, filed June 7, 2010). The Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the R e c o m m e n d a tio n to which objection is made. It is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as f o llo w s : 1. P la in tif f 's Objection to the Recommendation (Doc. #17) be and the same is h e re b y OVERRULED; 2. T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #14) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3. P la in tif f 's motion for preliminary injunction be and the same is hereby D E N IE D ; 4. T h is case be and the same is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate 1 Judge for additional proceedings. Done this the 18th day of June, 2010. /s / Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?