Gentry v. Keller (INMATE 3)

Filing 13

ORDER adopting the 12 RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate; dismissing the case without prejudice because this case is not ripe for review and because of Gentry's failure to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the procedures established by the Bureau of Prisons. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/25/2010. (br, )

Download PDF
Gentry v. Keller (INMATE 3) Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RANDY GENTRY, Petitioner, vs. J. A. KELLER, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv370-WHA (WO) ORDER No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #12), entered on August 3, 2010, the court adopts the Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED without prejudice, because this case is not ripe for review and because of Gentry's failure to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the procedures established by the Bureau of Prisons. DONE this 25th day August, 2010. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?