Watkins v. Hayes et al (INMATE2)

Filing 12

ORDER directing that after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The plaintiff's 11 objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on June 21, 2010 is overruled; (2) The [ 10] Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on June 1, 2010 is adopted; (3) Plaintiff's complaint challenging events which occurred on December 1, 2005 and June 29, 2007 is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. &# 167; 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as plaintiff failed to file the complaint with regard to these allegations within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations; and (4) The complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/21/10. (scn, )

Download PDF
W a t k i n s v. Hayes et al (INMATE2) D o c . 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION T Y R E T. WATKINS, P l a i n t if f , v. M S . HAYES, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C A S E NO. 2:10-cv-0376-TMH WO ORDER A f te r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #11) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e filed on June 21, 2010 is overruled; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #10) filed on June 1, 2010 is a d o p te d ; 3 . Plaintiff's complaint challenging events which occurred on December 1, 2005 and J u n e 29, 2007 is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1 9 1 5 (e )(2 )(B )(i) as plaintiff failed to file the complaint with regard to these allegations w ith i n the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations. 4 . The complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process. D O N E this the 21st day of September, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?