Joiner v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER directing that: 1) The 3 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; and 3) This case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plf's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/20/2010. (wcl, )
J o i n e r v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION H E N R Y JOINER, #140 755 P l a i n t if f , v. C O M M ISSIO N E R , RICHARD F. ALLEN, et al. , D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2 : 1 0 -C V -4 0 0 -T M H WO
O n June 4, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 3) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed.1 Upon an independent review of the file in th is case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is O R D E R E D that: 1. 2. 2. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 3) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; T h e motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; and T h is case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the
f u ll filing fee upon the initiation of this case.
On June 17, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 4) as to the Recommendation. On June 21, 2010, the Court construed the Notice as a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and denied the motion (Doc. 5). "[A] premature notice of appeal does not divest the district court of jurisdiction over the case," United States v. Kapelushnik, 306 F.3d 1090, 1094 (11th Cir.2002), and "[a]n attempt to appeal a non-appealable order remains just that, an attempt[,] ... [and] a nullity," id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Because a Magistrate Judge's recommendation is not an appealable order under § 1292, this court may rule on the recommendation despite the notice of appeal.
D o n e this 20 th day of September, 2010. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?