Cross v. Keller (INMATE 3)
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the petitioner's 14 objection is overruled; (2) the petitioner's 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is adopted; (3) the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED without prejudice because Cross has failed to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the procedures established by the BOP. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/21/10. (djy, )
C r o s s v. Keller (INMATE 3)
D o c . 15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF N O R T H E R N DIVISION H E W IE CROSS, P e t i t io n e r , v. J . A. KELLER, et al., R e s p o n d e n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C A S E NO. 2:10-cv-0425-TMH WO
A f te r an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE o f the court that: 1 . The petitioner's objection (Doc. #14) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e filed on July 30, 2010 is overruled; 2 . The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #13) filed on July 26, 2010 is adopted; 3 . The 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED without p re ju d ic e because Cross has failed to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the p ro c e d u re s established by the BOP. D O N E this the 21st day of September, 2010. /s / Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS S E N IO R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?