Chatman v. Tampa et al
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) plf Lidror Chatmon's 53 objections are overruled; (2) the US Mag Judge's 52 recommendation is adopted; (3) the 31 m otion for summary judgment is granted; (4) judgment is entered in favor of said defs and against plf, with plf taking nothing by her complaint as to said defs; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directin g the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is terminated as to said defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/3/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
LIDROR J. CHATMON,
VISION HOSPITALITY and
CIVIL ACTION NO.
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff Lidror J. Chatmon's objections (Doc.
No. 53) are overruled.
recommendation (Doc. No. 52) is adopted.
(3) The motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 31)
filed by defendants Vision Hospitality, LLC, and P & T
Suites (incorrectly named in the complaint as Hampton
Inn) is granted.
(4) Judgment is entered in favor of said defendants
and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by
her complaint as to said defendants.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is terminated as to said defendants.
DONE, this the 3rd day of August, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?