Ward v. Little et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 8

ORDER; that 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 7 be and the same ishereby ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; 2. The Plaintiff's complaint 1 against the Defendants challenging events which occurred on or about June 14, 2005 be and th e same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as further set out; 3. The Plaintiff's state law claim(s) be and the same are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice; 4. The Plaintiff's complaint 1 be and the same is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 8/31/2010. (jg, )

Download PDF
Ward v. Little et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION R U P E R T WARD, JR., #251 750 P la in tiff, v. C H A S E LITTLE, et al., D e fe n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:10-cv-532-ID ) (W O ) ) ) ) ) ORDER O n July 26, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to w h ic h no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 7). Upon an independent review of th e file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate J u d g e , it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #7) be and the same is h e re b y ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; 2. The Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. #1) against the Defendants challenging events w h ic h occurred on or about June 14, 2005 be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with p re ju d ic e pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) because the Plaintiff fa ile d to file the complaint with regard to these allegations within the time prescribed by th e applicable period of limitation; 3 . The Plaintiff's state law claim(s) be and the same are hereby DISMISSED 1 Dockets.Justia.com without prejudice; and 4. The Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. #1) be and the same is hereby DISMISSED p rio r to service of process. D o n e this the 31st day of August, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?