White v. Brooks et al (INMATE 2)
ORDERING and ADJUDGING that the 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for the plf's failure to comply with the orders of the court and to prosecute this action. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 8/25/10. (djy, )
W h i t e v. Brooks et al (INMATE 2)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O RT H E R N DIVISION Q U IN N MARIO WHITE, #249630, P l a i n t i ff , v. D .A. ELEANOR BROOKS, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:10cv545-ID (WO)
O P I N I O N and ORDER O n July 26, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which n o timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 4). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be a n d is hereby ADOPTED and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice fo r the plaintiff's failure to comply with the orders of the court and to prosecute this action. D o n e this the 25 th day of August, 2010.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?