Beasley et al v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
ORDERED that 15 Objections are OVERRULED; (2) The 10 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; and (3) The 3 Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief is DENIED and DISMISSED as further set out. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 10/18/2010. (cb, )
-SRW Beasley et al v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION G E N E BEASLEY, #161 851, P e titio n e r, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C iv il Action No. 2:10-CV-547-ID (W O )
W IL L IE THOMAS, WARDEN, et al., R e sp o n d e n ts .
B e fo re the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #10) and P e titio n e r's Objections (Doc. #15). Having conducted a de novo determination of those p o rtio n s of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and O R D E R E D as follows: 1. P e titio n e r's Objections (Doc. #15) be and the same are hereby O VERRU LED ; 2. T h e Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #10) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; and 3. T h e petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. #3) filed by Gene Beasley be a n d the same is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED in accordance with the p ro v isio n s of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), as the Petitioner failed to obtain th e requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of appeals authorizing a fe d e ra l district court to consider his successive habeas application.
DONE this the 18th day of October, 2010. /s / Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?