Bowhall v. Office of James M. Deimen et al

Filing 12

ORDERED as follows: 1) Mr. Bowhall's objections (Docs. # 9 - 10 ) are OVERRULED; 2) The 8 Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) Mr. Bowhall's claims against Dfts are DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii) and for failure to obey court orders; 4) Mr. Bowhall's filing titled "Continuation Motion with Supplemental," to the extent it contains further objections to the Recommendation, is DENIED as untimely and on the merits; 5) Any outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 11/15/2010. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM E. BOWHALL, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF JAMES M. DEIMEN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:10-CV-604-WKW [WO] ) ) ) ) ) ORDER On October 18, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation ("Recommendation").1 (Doc. # 8.) Plaintiff William E. Bowhall responded by filing a Motion to Continue (Doc. # 9) and supplemental material (Doc. # 10). These filings are construed liberally as objections. The court has conducted a de novo review of all pleadings and documents in this action, including the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and Mr. Bowhall's objections. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Based upon that review, the court finds that the objections lack merit and that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: Mr. Bowhall has filed eight other civil actions in this court. See Bowhall v. Johnson & Johnson, No. 2:10cv601-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. Capitol-EMI Records, Inc., 2:10cv603-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. Howell High Sch. Bd. of Educ., No. 2:10cv605-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. Viacom, Inc., 2:10cv606-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. Dep't of Defense, No. 2:10cv607-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. NBC, Inc., 2:10cv608-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. Obama, No. 2:10cv609-WKW (July 14, 2010); Bowhall v. NAACP Beverly Hills, No. 2:10cv679-WKW (Aug. 10, 2010). 1 1. 2. 3. Mr. Bowhall's objections (Docs. # 9-10) are OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. # 8) is ADOPTED. Mr. Bowhall's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii) and for failure to obey court orders. 4. Mr. Bowhall's filing titled "Continuation Motion with Supplemental," to the extent it contains further objections to the Recommendation, is DENIED as untimely and on the merits. 5. Any outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. An appropriate final judgment will be entered. DONE this 15th day of November, 2010. /s/ W. Keith Watkins UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?