Harville v. Boyd et al (INMATE2)

Filing 15

ORDER: No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 14 , entered on May 14, 2012, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of the Defendants, with costs taxed against the Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/6/2012. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION KIRKPATRICK HARVILLE, #165650, Plaintiff, vs. LOUIS BOYD, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv653-WHA (WO) ORDER No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #14), entered on May 14, 2012, the court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of the Defendants, with costs taxed against the Plaintiff. DONE this 6th day of June, 2012. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?