Williams v. Allen et al
Filing
52
ORDERED that : (1) The 23 Objection to the Magistrate Judge Recommendations is OVERRULED: (2) The 21 and 22 Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; (3) The 7 Motion to Certify the case as a class action is DENIED; (4) The 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED; (5) The Plaintiff Rule 60(b) Motion contained in the 23 Objection is DENIED as moot; and (6) This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/31/2010. (cb, )
Williams v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
Doc. 52
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION
D A R R E L L WILLIAMS, #179642 P la in tiff, v. R IC H A R D ALLEN, et al., D e fe n d a n ts .
) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:10-cv-657-ID ) (W O ) ) ) ) )
ORDER
T h is case is before the Court on two Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Docs. # 2 1 and #22) and the Plaintiff's Objection to the Magistrate Judge Recommendations (Doc. # 2 3 ). The Plaintiff's Objection includes a Rule 60(b) motion in response to an Order of the M a g is tra te Judge directing the Plaintiff to file an amended complaint (Doc. #20). After the P la in tiff filed his Objection and Rule 60(b) motion, the Magistrate Judge vacated its previous O rd e r for an amended complaint (Doc. #24). As a result, the Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion is due to be denied as moot. T h e re are two other motions filed by the plaintiff that are pending: a motion to certify th e case as a class action (Doc. #7), and a motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. #3). The M a g istra te Judge has made recommendations regarding both motions. The Magistrate Judge re c o m m e n d s that the Plaintiff's motion to certify the case as a class action be denied. (Doc. # 2 1 ). The Magistrate Judge also recommends that the Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Injunction be denied. (Doc. #22). The Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the R e c o m m e n d a tio n s of the Magistrate Judge to which objection is made. d e te rm in a tio n , it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED that 1 . The Plaintiff's Objection to the Magistrate Judge Recommendations (Doc. #23) b e and the same is OVERRULED; 2 . The Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Docs. #21 and #22) be and the s a m e are hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; 3. The Plaintiff's motion to certify the case as a class action (Doc. #7) be and the s a m e is hereby DENIED; 4 . The Plaintiff's motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. #3) be and the same is h e re b y DENIED; 5. The Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion contained in the Objection (Doc. #23) be and the s a m e is hereby DENIED as moot; and 6. This case be and the same is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for a d d itio n a l proceedings. Done this the 31st day of August, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE After this
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?