Buchanon v. Thompkins et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 21

OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 7 Recommendation; dismissing the plaintiff's claims against Defendants Boyd, Sconyers, Barbers, and Woods with prejudice prior to service of process; dismissing the same defendants as parties in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and referring the case back to the magistrate for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/28/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (br, )

Download PDF
Buchanon v. Thompkins et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION T E R R Y JAMES BUCHANON, II, # 2 2 4 845, P la in tiff, v. S G T . BRIAN THOMPKINS, et al., D e fe n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:10cv660-ID (WO) O P I N I O N and ORDER O n September 1, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to w h ic h no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 7). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #7) be and the same is h e re b y ADOPTED; 2. T h e plaintiff's claims against Defendants Boyd, Sconyers, Barbers, and Woods b e and the same are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice and prior to service of process; 3. D e fe n d a n ts Boyd, Sconyers, Barbers, and Woods be and the same are hereby D IS M IS S E D as parties in this cause of action in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 4. T h is case, with respect to the remaining defendants, be and the same is hereby Dockets.Justia.com REFERRED BACK to the United States Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. D o n e this the 28th day of September, 2010. /s / Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?