Pleasant v. Giles et al (INMATE 1)
ORDERING and ADJUDGING that the 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: (1) to the extent Pleasant seeks habeas corpus relief, the instant application is DENIED; (2) to the extent Pleasant seeks issuance of a petition for writ of mandamus, this request is DENIED; (3) this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/29/10. (djy, )
P l e a s a n t v. Giles et al (INMATE 1)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION P O L AN SK I PLEASANT, #201195, P e t i t io n e r , v. J. C. GILES, et al., R e s p o n d e n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C IV IL ACTION NO. 2:10cv685-ID
O R D E R AND OPINION
O n September 9, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to w h ic h no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 4). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be a n d is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. T o the extent Pleasant seeks habeas corpus relief, the instant application is D E N IE D . 2. T o the extent Pleasant seeks issuance of a petition for writ of mandamus, this re q u e s t is DENIED.
T h is case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Done this the 29 th day of September, 2010.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?