Norton v. Boyd et al (INMATE1)

Filing 37

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 36 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and that: 1) The dfts' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 2) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the dfts; 3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) The costs of this proceeding is taxed against the plf. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/25/2013. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RONALD D. NORTON, JR., #242735, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS BOYD, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv703-MEF ORDER On September 4, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 36). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and that: 1. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. The costs of this proceeding is taxed against the plaintiff. th DONE this the 25 day of September, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?