Moorer v. Caroline Steel Group, LLC et al
ORDER DENYING 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; plf is advised that if he fails either to renew his motion or pay the filing fee by 9/13/2010 this action may be dismissed, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 8/31/10. (djy, )
-SRW Moorer v. Caroline Steel Group, LLC et al (MAG+)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CAROLINE STEEL GROUP, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER On August 19, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. By statute, this court is authorized to allow the commencement of this action without prepayment of fees, provided the plaintiff files an affidavit including all assets he possesses and stating that he is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff's affidavit does not meet the requirements of the statute. On the form affidavit completed by plaintiff, he states that within the past twelve months he has received income other than wages. However, he has not reported as requested on the form either the amount or source of the income or whether he expects to receive further income from that source in the future. See affidavit, ¶ 3.1 Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) is DENIED. Upon filing an affidavit in compliance with the statute, plaintiff may renew his motion. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails either to renew his motion or pay the filing fee by September 13, ANTHONY B. MOORER,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10CV705-MHT ( W O)
Plaintiff's answers regarding his debts and monthly expenses are also incomplete.
2010, this action may be dismissed. Done, this 31st day of August, 2010. /s/ Susan Russ Walker SUSAN RUSS WALKER CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?