Moss v. State of Alabama, Department of Corrections et al

Filing 47

ORDER that Plaintiff shall submit the proposed pretrial order in the proper format and by the proper means immediately. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/16/2011. (cc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CESAR MOSS, ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT ) OF CORRECTIONS; et al., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) CASE NO. 2:10cv-766-MEF (WO-Do Not Publish) ORDER On July 27, 2011, the Court entered an Order (Doc. # 44) which set the time of the final pretrial conference for this case. This Order also provided that: The parties are DIRECTED to JOINTLY prepare a proposed pretrial order in accordance with the attached outline. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to e:mail the proposed pretrial order to propord_fuller@almd.uscourts.gov in Word or WordPerfect format, to be received no later than three business days prior to the pretrial hearing. (Doc. # 44; emphasis in original). The pretrial hearing is set on Thursday, August 18, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. Accordingly, counsel for Plaintiff was required to email the proposed pretrial order by no later than August 15, 2011. The proposed pretrial order was not been timely provided to the Court as required. Instead, on August 16, 2011, counsel for Plaintiff sent a pdf version of the document to the Court. Counsel for Plaintiff has a demonstrated problem with complying with scheduling orders in this case. The Court reminds counsel for Plaintiff that this Court has the authority to punish attorneys appearing before it for a pattern of failure to comply with its Orders. Plaintiff shall submit the proposed pretrial order in the proper format and by the proper means immediately. Done this the 16 th day of August, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?