Barley v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER adopting the 24 Recommendation; denying the Motion for Preliminary Injunction embedded in the 1 complaint. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 12/6/2010. (br, )
- W C Barley v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)
D o c . 34
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL M. BARLEY, #260262, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER
T h e Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. No. 24) in this case to which n o timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an in d e p e n d e n t review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should b e adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. It is further O R D E R E D that Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, embedded in his C o m p lain t (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's R e c o m m e n d atio n . D o n e this 6 th day of December, 2010.
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-798-ID
BOB RILEY, et al., Defendants.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?