Barley v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 34

ORDER adopting the 24 Recommendation; denying the Motion for Preliminary Injunction embedded in the 1 complaint. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 12/6/2010. (br, )

- W C Barley v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)

D o c . 34

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL M. BARLEY, #260262, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER
T h e Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. No. 24) in this case to which n o timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an in d e p e n d e n t review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should b e adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. It is further O R D E R E D that Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, embedded in his C o m p lain t (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's R e c o m m e n d atio n . D o n e this 6 th day of December, 2010.

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-798-ID

BOB RILEY, et al., Defendants.

/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com