Wyrosdick v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 24

ORDER directing that upon review of the file in this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: (1) the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate judge be and the same is hereby ADOPTED; the Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction be and the same is hereby DENIED; (3) This case be and the same is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 11/17/10. (scn, )

Download PDF
Wyrosdick v. Riley et al (INMATE 2) (CONSENT) Doc. 24 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION P E T E R WYROSDICK, #196 364 P la in tiff, v. G O V E R N O R BOB RILEY, et al., D e fe n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 :1 0 -c v -8 0 0 -ID (W O ) ORDER On October 21, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #9) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #9) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. #1) be and the same is hereby DENIED; 3. This case be and the same is hereby REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Done this the 17th day of November, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?