Means v. Paul's Body & Paint Shop, Inc. et al
OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) Defendant Paul's Body & Paint Shop, Inc.'s 38 motion for leave to file summary-judgment motion out of time is denied; (2) Defendant Paul's Body & Paint Shop, Inc.'s 34 motion for summary judgment is denied as untimely; (3) Plaintiff Frederick Means's 36 and 37 motions to strike are denied as moot, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/14/11. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
PAUL’S BODY & PAINT SHOP,
INC., and JAMES HOWARD,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
OPINION AND ORDER
Based on the representations made on-the-record on
July 14, 2011, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) Defendant Paul’s Body & Paint Shop, Inc.’s motion
for leave to file summary-judgment motion out of time
(doc. no. 38) is denied.
(2) Defendant Paul’s Body & Paint Shop, Inc.’s motion
for summary judgment (doc. no. 34) is denied as untimely.
(3) Plaintiff Frederick Means’s motions to strike
(doc. nos. 36 and 37) are denied as moot.
Defendant Paul’s Body & Paint Shop, Inc.’s extension
request, which comes a month after the dispositive-motion
deadline, violates § 15(b) of the uniform scheduling
motions will be denied outright.”); an earlier extension
request was denied (doc. no. 33), and there was no
pretrial and trial dates, plaintiff Frederick Means would
be prejudiced by an extension.
See McClaney v. Macon
County Bd. of Educ., 2011 WL 9015 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 3,
2011) (Thompson, J.).
DONE, this the 14th day of July, 2011.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?