Johnson v. Mclendon et al (INMATE2)
ORDER directing that (1) the 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff's 5 Objection to the Recommendation be OVERRULED; (3) Plaintiff's complaint challenging events which occurred on 04/05/2008 be DISMISSED wit h prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B)(i) as Plaintiff failed to file the complaint with regard to these allegations within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitation; and (4) this complaint be DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 12/1/10. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
- T F M Johnson v. Mclendon et al (INMATE2)
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA N O R T H E R N DIVISION N IC A D E M U S ORLANDO JOHNSON, P l a i n t if f , v. O F F I C E R ANTHONY MCLENDON, et al. , D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2 : 1 0 -C V -90 0 -ID WO
O n October 29, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 4) in this c a se , and a Supplemental Recommendation (Doc. 7) on November 10, 2010. Plaintiff has n o t filed timely objections to the Supplemental Recommendation. Upon an independent re vie w of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the M a gistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. T h e Recommendation (Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; P la in tiff's Objections to the Recommendation (Doc. 5) be OVERRULED; P la in tiff's complaint challenging events which occurred on April 5, 2008 be D IS M IS SE D with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1 9 1 5 ( e )( 2 )( B ) (i) as Plaintiff failed to file the complaint with regard to these a lle ga tio n s within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitation; and
T h i s complaint be DISMISSED prior to service of process. D o n e this 1 st day of December, 2010.
/s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?