Koninklijke Ahold, N.V. v. Millbrook Commons, LLC et al

Filing 70

ORDER directing that, upon consideration of Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Millbrook Commons' ("Millbrook") 69 Renewed Motion to Extend Time for Filing Notice of Appeal, and pursuant to this Court's authority under FRCP Rule 5 8, the Court finds that the motion is due to be GRANTED; accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Millbrook's 69 Renewed Motion to Extend Time for Filing Notice of Appeal is GRANTED; (2) The deadline for filing a Notice of Appeal in the abo ve-styled action is EXTENDED until seven (7) days after the Court enters an order ruling on Millbrook's pending 61 Motion for Reasonable Attorneys' Fees and Costs of Litigation, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Alter or Amend. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/17/13. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION KONINKLIJKE AHOLD, N.V., Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, v. MILLBROOK COMMONS, LLC, et al., Defendants/CounterclaimPlaintiffs. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1060-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) ORDER Upon consideration of Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Millbrook Commons’ (“Millbrook”) Renewed Motion to Extend Time for Filing Notice of Appeal (Doc. #69), and pursuant to this Court’s authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 58, the Court finds that the motion is due to be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Millbrook’s Renewed Motion to Extend Time for Filing Notice of Appeal (Doc. #69) is GRANTED. (2) The deadline for filing a Notice of Appeal in the above-styled action is EXTENDED until seven (7) days after the Court enters an order ruling on Millbrook’s pending Motion for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and Costs of Litigation, or, in the Alternative, Motion to Alter or Amend (Doc. #61). th DONE this the 17 day of January, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?