Chandler v. Hill et al (MAG+)

Filing 35

ORDER directing that the plaintiff's 33 objection is OVERRULED, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/24/11. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JOHNNY CLAYTON CHANDLER, Plaintiff, v. A. J. HILL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1081-MEF WO ORDER This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Objection to Courts[sic] Decision (Doc. # 33), which this Court construes as an objection to the May 5, 2011 (Doc. # 25) denying Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel to represent him. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), this Court has reviewed the objection, the Magistrate Judge’s Order, and all submissions related to those Orders. This Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s Order is neither clearly erroneous, nor contrary to law. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's objection is OVERRULED. DONE this 24th day of August, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?