Anderson v. State of Alabama, et al (INMATE2)

Filing 14

ORDER: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE that: 1. The 11 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants "Alabama Legislative Branch" and "all legislatively created agencies and agents" is DISMISS ED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 191 5(e)(2)(B)(i-iii); 3. Plaintiffs challenge to the validity of his confinement is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 4. The complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 4/6/2011. (dmn)

-TFM Anderson v. State of Alabama, et al (INMATE2)

Doc. 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION * * * * * 2:11-CV-60-TMH (WO)

MILTON ANDERSON, #180 139 Plaintiff, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et a!., Defendants.

ORDER

On March 14, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Recommendation (Doc. 11) to which no timely objections were made. Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. 11) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiffs complaint against Defendants "Alabama Legislative Branch" and "all legislatively created agencies and agents" is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 191 5(e)(2)(B)(i-iii); 3. Plaintiffs challenge to the validity of his confinement is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 4. The complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process.

Page 1 of 2

Dockets.Justia.com

bL

DONE thisday of April, 2011.

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

.