McKenzie v. Alabama Department of Corrections(INMATE 2)

Filing 9

ORDER directing as follows: 1) Plf's Objections (Docs. # 5 , # 7 ) be and the same are hereby OVERRULED; 2) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3) The Plf's complaint against the Alabama Department of Corrections be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/22/2011. (wcl, )

Download PDF
-CSC McKenzie v. Alabama Department of Corrections(INMATE 2) Doc. 9 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RODNEY MCKENZIE, #229 611 Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-CV-97-ID (WO) ORDER Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #4), and Plaintiff's Objections, (Docs. #5, #7). Having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Objections (Docs. #5, #7) be and the same are hereby OVERRULED; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3. The Plaintiff's complaint against the Alabama Department of Corrections be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Dockets.Justia.com DONE this the 22nd day of March, 2011. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?