McKenzie v. Alabama Department of Corrections(INMATE 2)

Filing 9

ORDER directing as follows: 1) Plf's Objections (Docs. # 5 , # 7 ) be and the same are hereby OVERRULED; 2) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3) The Plf's complaint against the Alabama Department of Corrections be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/22/2011. (wcl, )

-CSC McKenzie v. Alabama Department of Corrections(INMATE 2)

Doc. 9

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RODNEY MCKENZIE, #229 611 Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:11-CV-97-ID (WO)

ORDER
Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #4), and Plaintiff's Objections, (Docs. #5, #7). Having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Objections (Docs. #5, #7) be and the same are hereby OVERRULED; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3. The Plaintiff's complaint against the Alabama Department of Corrections be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii).

Dockets.Justia.com

DONE this the 22nd day of March, 2011. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE