Bedsole v. Guice et al (INMATE1)

Filing 66

ORDER as follows: 1. Mr. Bedsole's 65 Objections are OVERRULED; 2. The 59 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3. Defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/18/2014. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
FARRELL BEDSOLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
NURSE GUICE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-121-WKW

ORDER
On February 13, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this
case. (Doc. # 59.) On March 17, Plaintiff Farrell Bedsole filed objections. (See
Doc. # 65.) The court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those
portions of the Recommendation to which the objections are made. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1). The court concludes that the objections are without merit and that the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is due to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

Mr. Bedsole’s objections (Doc. # 65) are OVERRULED;

2.

The Recommendation (Doc. # 59) is ADOPTED;

3.

Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are GRANTED;

4.

This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 18th day of March, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2