Watkins v. The City of Montgomery

Filing 114

ORDER: Upon consideration of the arguments made by counsel during the 1/29/2013 telephonic status conference, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiffs' 87 Motion to Strike Trial Witnesses is DENIED; and (2) Plaintiff's 88 Motion to Require Defendant to Bear the Cost of Producing Its "Payroll Records" is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/14/2013. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ROOSEVELT WATKINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:11-cv-158-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) ORDER Upon consideration of the arguments made by counsel during the January 29, 2013 telephonic status conference, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Trial Witnesses (Doc. #87) is DENIED; and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Require Defendant to Bear the Cost of Producing Its “Payroll Records” (Doc. #88) is DENIED. DONE this the 14th day of February, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?