Watkins v. The City of Montgomery
ORDERED that Plfs' 99 Motion in Limine and Plfs' 100 Motion to Exclude Witnesses from Trial are DENIED as moot; further ORDERED that Dft's 111 Motion in Limine is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/19/2013. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
ROOSEVELT WATKINS, et al.,
CITY OF MONTGOMERY,
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-158-MEF
(WO – Do Not Publish)
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine (Doc. #99) and Plaintiffs’
Motion to Exclude Witnesses from Trial (Doc. #100) are DENIED as moot.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion in Limine (Doc. #111) is DENIED
DONE this the 19th day of March, 2013.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?