Watkins v. The City of Montgomery

Filing 132

ORDERED that Plfs' 99 Motion in Limine and Plfs' 100 Motion to Exclude Witnesses from Trial are DENIED as moot; further ORDERED that Dft's 111 Motion in Limine is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/19/2013. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ROOSEVELT WATKINS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF MONTGOMERY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-158-MEF
(WO – Do Not Publish)

ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine (Doc. #99) and Plaintiffs’
Motion to Exclude Witnesses from Trial (Doc. #100) are DENIED as moot.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion in Limine (Doc. #111) is DENIED
as moot.
DONE this the 19th day of March, 2013.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE