King v. U.S. Attorney et al (INMATE3)
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (2) the 28 USC 2255 motion filed by King is DENIED, as it was filed after expiration of the one-year-limitation period in 28 USC 2255(f) and the claims therein entitle him to no relief. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/2/13. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
BENNY RAY KING,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-0186-MEF
On April 3, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #33) in this
case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by King is DENIED, as it was filed after
expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f) and the claims therein
entitle him to no relief.
DONE this the 2nd day of May, 2013.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?