Williams v. Meeks et al (INMATE1)
ORDER adopting the 27 Recommendations; granting the defendants' 23 24 Motions for Summary Judgment; dismissing the case with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust the administrative remedy previously available to him at the Covington County Jail; taxing costs against the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/16/2011. (br, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
ROBERT WAYNE WILLIAMS,
DENNIS MEEKS, et al.,
CIV. ACT. NO. 2:11cv199-WHA
OPINION and ORDER
On July 13, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 27). Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that:
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED;
The defendants’ motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED
to the extent that the defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaontiff’s failure to
properly exhaust the administrative remedy previously available to him at the Covington
That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with
the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the plaintiff’s failure to properly exhaust the
administrative remedy previously available to him at the Covington County Jail.
Costs be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Done this the 16th day of August, 2011.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?