Fareed v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 8

ORDER directing as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 7 Objection be and the same is hereby OVERRULED; (2) The 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; (3) This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 5/10/11. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION AKRAM IBIN FAREED, #214664, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-220-ID (WO) ORDER Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #5), and Plaintiff’s Objection, (Doc. #7). Having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. #7) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #5) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3. This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). DONE this the 10th day of May, 2011. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?