Murray v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 12

ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 10 Objection be and the same is hereby OVERRULED; 2) The 8 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED; 3) This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Signed by Honorable Judge Ira De Ment on 6/17/2011. (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
KENNITH WAYNE MURRAY
#242 351,
Plaintiff,
v.
ASSIST. WARDEN KENNETH
SCONYERS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:11-CV-257-ID
(WO)

ORDER
Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #8), and
Plaintiff’s Objection, (Doc. #10). Having conducted a de novo determination of those
portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and
ORDERED as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. #10) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED;

2.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8) be and the same is
hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED;

3.

This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to
service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii).

1

DONE this the 17th day of June, 2011.
/s/ Ira DeMent
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2