Echols v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
10
OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1) The 7 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) The plf's challenge to the validity of his conviction and/or sentence be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 3) The complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Judge Ira De Ment on 6/16/2011. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
D. C. ECHOLS, #165602,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv277-ID
(WO)
OPINION and ORDER
On May 25, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 7). Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED;
2.
The plaintiff’s challenge to the validity of his conviction and/or sentence be
and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and
3.
The complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process.
Done this 16th day of June, 2011.
/s/ Ira DeMent
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?