Bell v. Croskey, et al (INMATE2)

Filing 15

ORDER: Plaintiff's Objections (Docs. 11 and 13 ) be and the same are hereby OVERRULED. The Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Docs. 10 and 12 ) be and the same are hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C.
67; 1983 complaint against the named defendants be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i & ii). Plaintiff's due process and verbal abuse/harassment claims, as discus sed in the 5/26/2011 Supplemental Recommendation, are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); and this case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i & ii). Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/20/2011. (dmn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
TIFFANY LASHEA BELL, #212 792,
Plaintiff,
V.
BEVERLY CROSKEY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:1 1-CV-300-TMH
(WO)

ORDER
Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #10), the
Supplemental Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #12), and the Plaintiff's
objections to those Recommendations, (Does. #1 land #13). Having conducted a de novo
determination of those portions of the Magistrate's Recommendations to which objections
are made, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows:
1.

Plaintiffs objections (Does. #11 and #13) be and the same are hereby

OVERRULED;
2. The Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Does. #10 and #12) be and the
same are hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED;
3. Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the named defendants be and the
same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i & ii);
4. Plaintiffs due process and verbal abuse/harassment claims, as discussed in the

May 26, 2011 Supplemental Recommendation, are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i); and

5. This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process in
accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i & ii).

if) I'

Done, this thay of September 2011.

/5/ f/44.øw-4-.

TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE