Bradham v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 6

ORDER overruling the 5 Objections; adopting the 4 Recommendation; dismissing the complaint without prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Judge Ira De Ment on 5/31/2011. (br, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
KENNETH EDWARD BRADHAM,
Plaintiff,
v.
DENNIS MEEKS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:11-CV-348-ID
(WO)

ORDER
Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #4), and
Plaintiff’s Objection, (Doc. #5). Having conducted a de novo determination of those
portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and
ORDERED as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. #5) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED;

2.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4) be and the same is
hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED;

3.

This Plaintiff’s complaint be and the same is hereby DISMISSED without
prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE this the 31st day of May, 2011.
/s/ Ira DeMent
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE