Bradham v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER overruling the 5 Objections; adopting the 4 Recommendation; dismissing the complaint without prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Judge Ira De Ment on 5/31/2011. (br, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
KENNETH EDWARD BRADHAM,
DENNIS MEEKS, et al.,
Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. #4), and
Plaintiff’s Objection, (Doc. #5). Having conducted a de novo determination of those
portions of the Recommendation to which objections are made, it is CONSIDERED and
ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. #5) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED;
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4) be and the same is
hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED;
This Plaintiff’s complaint be and the same is hereby DISMISSED without
prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
DONE this the 31st day of May, 2011.
/s/ Ira DeMent
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?