Vardon v. City of Montgomery, Alabama Retirement Fund(MAG+)
Filing
28
ORDER: 1. The defendant's 26 Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed on 11/2/2011, is overruled; 2. The 25 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, entered on 10/24/2011, is adopted; 3. The defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for a More Definite Statement and 24 Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/1/2012. (dmn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES M. VARDON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA
RETIREMENT FUND,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:11-cv-352-MEF
(WO)
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Coody has filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 25) that this Court
deny the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for a More Definite
Statement (Doc. # 5) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 24). Upon an
independent review of the file, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The defendant’s objection (Doc. #26) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge, filed on November 2, 2011, is overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #25), entered on October
24, 2011, is adopted;
3. The defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for a More
Definite Statement (Doc. # 5) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 24) are
DENIED.
st
DONE this the 1 day of February, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?